Profile information is not specified.

May 05, 2019
  • Support 1
  • Technology 1
  • Quality of offers 1
  • Reliability 1
  • Profitability 0
  • Promotional materials 0
  • Reliability 0

Signed up. Talked with the manager in Skype, approved. Went to the personal office, looked at the offers. I sent a request for their likes, but the request processed more than a day, and then within a couple of seconds all requests were rejected. I thought that maybe some bug in their system, as rejections came really within a couple of seconds immediately to all requests. Repeated requests for other offers, a day later, all the same. The manager did not try to contact us and inquire about the traffic that was going to be drove traffic, and in general they did not show any interest, just a simple refusal without any explanation. It is immediately obvious that all the requests without understanding on the automatic press "Refuse" and that's all. Very interesting approach to work in general...
Скрин 1

скрин 2

UPD:
Complement review. After a bunch of time in Skype wrote a support team, said that I will not approve anything, work with what is there right now. Okay, fine. Tested 10 available to me, the result is zero. That is, from the 10 registrations on different sites counted exactly zero registrations. As in foreign, as well as in Russia. Make your own conclusions gentlemen.

Translated from the original
4


May 07, 2019, 12:34

Hello Nikolai, thank you for your review and we are sorry that we did not meet your expectations.

Reasons for refusal of requests for offers:

- Illogical choice of offers. You made requests for offers from completely different verticals and different geo. You chose them based on pay per lead, since all of these offers have a payout of $10 or more. This shows that you are not guided by the vertical, and correspondence of your traffic sources, but only by the level of payout, which is quite unprofessional.

- We do not know the quality of your traffic. And we provide only verified partners with such payouts.

- your testing of the available offers looks like this. http://joxi.net/D2P00Zkiq... I think there is no need to comment.

- And lastly. Are you talking about 10 registrations? Are you so sure that there are 10? How can you be so sure? Maybe you made them yourself?

We wish you success, Nicholas)

NikolaSSS
May 07, 2019, 20:20

I made requests for: Verticals: Dating and Adalt Dating. GEO: USA, Canada, UK (the most popular) is even in my screenshots can be seen. Payout varies from 3 to 15$ should I add more screenshots here or what? And yes, all 10 registrations, I did myself, as I wrote earlier for testing. Everything was done from my IP and after checking, I had to write to you and tell you that I checked the offers, although you yourself would have seen it. And yes, if something you add only verified partners then warn the new partners in advance, or close them access to these offerers, and not freeze the application for days and then without explanation, do not reject. I am writing here not in order to besmirch you and your affiliate program, and so that the new webs know what to be prepared for, since you yourself can not tell them about it.

alexs
June 23, 2019, 17:37

So the illogical choice of providers is your reason for rejection? Maybe the person wanted to test all directions? And why do you suspect all in a row in the frod? Maybe he saw these 10 regs in the tracker? I do not understand.


September 10, 2021, 15:34

*Joking that it took us two years to respond to that comment.

And seriously, we want to summarize:

1) The industry requires us to carefully check conversions, be skeptical, and look for frod paterns🙂 and 10 "test" leads are considered frod unless the affiliate manager has been alerted to them;

2) We reserve the right to refuse to upurge on an affiliate if we are not sure of the quality of the affiliate's traffic. But if a partner is eager to try, we try to give a test-cap and go to a meeting.

3) Cpamatica is open for new partners, if you know what I mean :)

Все комментарии

This review reflects the subjective opinion of the user, and not the official position of the editors.