Profile information is not specified.
I'm replying to your message after 4 years. I hope it worked out for you. I'm a rare visitor to the forums.
Earned money no one will look, because there will be a bunch of reasons for the refusal of the "alleged" advertiser
Option 1: Affiliate network is afraid to actually raise questions from the webmaster due to counter-check the traffic of the bank as a whole on the network, so the partner network is unprofitable to ask the reasons for refusal on conversions
Option 2: The bank claims that all grids are the same in terms of payout and terms. So the network takes the confirmed requests from webmaster and tells the webmaster that the bank supposedly checked everything twice and there will be no reconciliation of statistics, knowing that the web will not get through to the bank (to get through to the bank if you're not an agency - very difficult).
In the work of Leadgid and directly to the banks, something is unclean and suspicious
This is my subjective opinion without any specific complaint
I tested your microfinance (MFI) programs - a completely different result - a positive impression is formed, the percentage of confirmation pleasantly surprised
But Leadgid in 17-18-19 years also appropriated applications and everyone knew it, then many networks worked like that. But Leadgid paid out and already well. And minus a couple dozen orders on the volume is imperceptible. But please note so worked read all the networks then.
I can't say for now. I haven't worked on financial ones for a long time. And in general, I do not work on grids.
But I can say that after Leadgid >>>>>> the leads-su grid seemed to me more pleasant and fair (not advertising).