goshaleshiy

Profile information is not specified.

August 09, 2021
  • Profitability 10
  • Problems with anti-viruses 1
  • Stability 1
  • Support 1

I am a webmaster, I create and sell websites.
First I do seo, promotion, put advertising space.
Before selling the codes of advertising I respectively remove.
At Dao there is no way to remove old, unnecessary or non-working sites.
During the account accumulated unnecessary sites without codes.
Once they were all stopped due to insufficient traffic and immediately after that the account was blocked.
As a result, sites that were not stopped were also blocked.


Lost my hard earned money.
Letter to support was ignored.

There used to be a female team of moderators working on the project.
Everything was fine, quick answers and help, moderation of the site no more than a day.
Now the moderators have changed, all men and all czars.
There are no answers to emails.
Moderation of the site from a week or more.
If answers come, it is with such an intonation, as if you owe them.

With this kind of support, I would not recommend working on the project.

Translated from the original
5


August 11, 2021, 16:28

Good afternoon, I am writing as a manager who works with webmasters. Just because we have sites and accounts are not blocked. If you take a site that tried to add this webmaster (https://prnt.sc/1mua97i), its quality is visible to the untrained eye, and such sites are almost the same was added a lot. At the same time, the majority of sites of this webmaster is no longer working (supported by a screenshot https://prnt.sc/1mu8c09). From 12 sites added to our platform earlier only one is working now. Also it is strange when webmaster gives his traffic stats, but only last 3-5 days he has any traffic there.

We are monitoring the quality of our traffic, our anti-bot system stopped this webmaster's sites many times because of bot-traffic. Consequently, the account has been banned. Just like that nobody bans in our system, we take care of our webmasters, and we work only with real high-quality sites which give appropriate traffic. I do not recommend to all affiliate programs to work with this webmaster, because the quality of sites and traffic is horrible.

goshaleshiy
August 11, 2021, 23:06

Dear project manager Dao.Ad, what account are you talking about?

Site - https://prnt.sc/1mua97i not mine !!!

Site with screenshot - .......affiliate program.ua also not mine!

With pepeshkam not work, on principle. They are not for sale.

You would at least bother to look at the history of my account, not someone else's.

Or you don't have a history and you're just making up whatever you want?

Well, then, at least do not give the example of the url site.

Or the answer is not for me but an excuse for the readers of this blog?

You made me laugh.

And confirmed - there is something wrong with the support... to put it mildly.

I would like the Dao.Ad Admin to read this correspondence and look at the "work" of their employees.

goshaleshiy
August 13, 2021, 23:22

Sorry, I wrote a reply on emotion, because apparently my account has been banned because of other people's sites.

I did not look closely at these urls, and did not understand that it is 2 screenshots.

So, with full responsibility I declare - given in the screenshots sites:

webstudiya3.affiliate program.ua

and something completely incomprehensible - bebishop.affiliate program.ua/,http://0bq.ru

NOT MINE AND MINE HAVE NEVER BEEN!!!

I think you have the opportunity to activate my account for a couple of minutes and see a list of sites on it.

You will see for yourself.

I'm not fighting for account reinstatement or for a refund of unpaid funds. I want you to understand that I was banned for someone else's sites and admit my mistake. And as to take away their recommendations affiliate programs, which you screwed me.

Do not sculpt what nonsense in his excuses, and check everything is normal. Show that you are a manager who works with webmasters and not some oboltus that does not understand their own project and does not know where the sites.

goshaleshiy
August 11, 2021, 23:06

Dear project manager Dao.Ad, what account are you talking about?

Site - https://prnt.sc/1mua97i not mine !!!

Site with screenshot - .......affiliate program.ua also not mine!

With pepeshkam not work, on principle. They are not for sale.

You would at least bother to look at the history of my account, not someone else's.

Or you don't have a history and you're just making up whatever you want?

Well, then, at least do not give the example of the url site.

Or the answer is not for me but an excuse for the readers of this blog?

You made me laugh.

And confirmed - there is something wrong with the support... to put it mildly.

I would like the Dao.Ad Admin to read this correspondence and look at the "work" of their employees.


September 29, 2021, 11:47

Good afternoon, regarding the blocking of your account, and your non-working sites.

You wrote earlier that the sites are not yours, and these sites are also not yours ( https://prnt.sc/1u2ahz9 ; https://prnt.sc/1u2am0d ; https://prnt.sc/1u2aqxo ; https://prnt.sc/1u2ben1) ? And you can not see statistics of sites (https://prnt.sc/1u2bql0). Your sites do not work, and traffic on your sites does not pass the quality, even if you cheat by hand, we also see everything. Blocked you for substandard sites and traffic to them, and no matter how much you do not prove we have statistics and we see everything.

If you are so fiercely proving that you have quality sites and traffic to them, I suggest you to retest your traffic, on our internal companies, we will check everything and show after the test your traffic statistics and if the traffic is quality we will unblock your account and will credit you 5$ bonus. Expect feedback.

Все комментарии

This review reflects the subjective opinion of the user, and not the official position of the editors.

June 08, 2021
  • Stability 1
  • Quality of advertisers 1
  • Profitability 1
  • Support 1

SCAM.

Do not pay. Quietly work, runs a minimum and that's it - BAN.

Translated from the original
0

This review reflects the subjective opinion of the user, and not the official position of the editors.