June 05, 2020
  • Profitability 5
  • Promotional materials 7
  • Reliability 6
  • Support 5

I got my affiliate income cut off very sharply. Someone could not for a long time, but learned to play in the plus, and overlaps the income from other players. They will write back that you need to deal specifically on the topic, by nickname on the forum is not clear what my situation is. In response to the positive feedback, they write that here is an honest review, read them, everything is good. I do not understand why they do not give a percentage on each transaction? At a distance they all make a profit. + Made a limit of 50% of the player's deposit. Why? One can easily assume that the admins can enter a "successful player". And then say that you should invite more traffic 21 FTD for 30 days on the Advanced tariff, and you'll be happy, and forget about the other regular players who bring profit, because they are not covered by this advanced rate. Yes, and in general, it applies when the constant new traffic goes. In fact, forget about the past good profit, start an affiliate program from scratch, but work more, or if you do not reach at some point the advanced rate, you will sit with a 0 income. That's the thing, the advanced rate does not apply to older players. They just hint that you start your affiliate with 0, and drive traffic in new traffic all the time. Forget about the old regular players. The assumption is that they don't like people at this affiliate program who bring them traffic and therefore income. But this is hard to prove, as well as the opposite. For others who have similar situation, for example, deposits continue to make, a lot of transactions, and income has dropped sharply to zero, I suggest not to be lazy and write here honest feedback. Let it somehow affect the policy of affiliate program, if such a special situation will become a lot, and they will therefore cease to be special, and constant in the eyes of new potential partners.

Translated from the original

This review reflects the subjective opinion of the user, and not the official position of the editors.


0 reviews