Immediately explain the reason for such a long response to your review:

The fact that the correspondence with your manager, you immediately irretrievably erased, thereby deleting all evidence of the reverse side of this situation. But, since you did not provide any screenshots (evidence) of your arguments, let's assume that we can also answer you.

So, you drove traffic on the offer (which is not even specified) Bitcoin Revolution GB

http://joxi.ru/n2YJ0WYckE... - statistics for the period you specified with confirmation of the goal.

Conditions valid leads, geo UK, ip too, the real phone numbers, etc. kpi, which were discounted in person and prescribed in the offerer (evidence of this was erased by you)

just in case a screenshot of flow: http://joxi.ru/MAj5eNRsdb... (where this information is duplicated)

Your traffic was with Pusha, which in general did not contradict the terms of the offer, but as you described, the support manager gave you uproar on the source of Facebook, if the traffic is not bot.

Next, the manager reset you an unload, where there was all the information about the leads:

example: http://joxi.ru/nAy16ZeS9E...

Please pay attention to the Names, IP and overall validity of the requests. Manager all the details are explained, in fact, part of the valid leads and numbers have been paid according to the terms of the offerer (confirmation of payment - above a screenshot, which shows the confirmation), but I add another proof of payment - http://joxi.ru/a2XNY67cQ6...

Well, at the end, the accusations about the commission and what was taken, it is not true, we paid the full amount and immediately. The delay that was described was only due to a fair handling of the situation.

As a result of the above, we have only accusations of denying specific facts, leads were paid according to the conditions in the offerer, on the offerer information was provided correctly, uploads are also provided, the payment was made on time.

Thank you for the review!

Tell us your data in tg, please (@Aff1Official) - we need to understand who your manager is, see what offers you drove traffic traffic and understand the history of our cooperation.

We are sure that everything is not really as you described.

Thanks in advance!

Thank you for the feedback!

Tell us your data in tg, please (@Aff1Official) - we need to understand who your manager and understand the history of our cooperation.

We are sure that we can pick up a more suitable offer for your traffic.

Thanks in advance!

Tell us your data in tg, please (@Aff1Official) - we are interested in who is the manager, where and when you launched the traffic. We need it in order to understand the reason for dissatisfaction and pick the best offer for your traffic type.

We thank you in advance.

Which manager did you work with and when?

Let's look into your situation - tell us in more detail what happened.

Registration, still available at the link: aff1.com

It seems that this review was left by a competitor because we can not find a history of working with you in our system to understand the reason for this comment.

No one said that you can "make money" here - we're not a lottery or casino, it's a full-fledged operation.

Our task is to give webmasters and publishers the most suitable offer, convenient lead tracking and timely payment for quality results.

If you're not satisfied, you probably got caught on a frod or you have zero quality traffic.

statisstics on your leads in our admin panel - http://joxi.ru/n2YVak3HbY...

1. Alphamax - 27 leads.

24.12.2019 from 00:35 you drove traffic the leads on this offer, the last lead is fixed in our system at 05:04 am.

By coincidence, a couple of hours after your launch, the advertiser notified us that he plans to stop the offerer, this is confirmed by the News about the planned stop of the offerer published by us, namely on 24.12.2019 at 11:46 "The remaining orders will be accepted until 11:00 on 25.12.2019", that is a day before the actual stop, which does not contradict the rules. In other words, your leads logged in at a time when the offer was fully functional.

That is, all the leads drove traffic in before the actual stop-offer - dialed by the call center in standard mode. After the stop of the offer, on December 25, we made a request for an additional redial of your leads, as well as updating the status of the already processed leads, which was reported earlier in the dialog manager.

The question of the unprocessing of your leads is excluded, because the leads were drove traffic on the working offer before we ourselves were aware of the impending shutdown.

Next.

You have provided a screenshot of the same offer, from another affiliate network, which for a period of 2 months, a section of 1756 leads your uprun, excluding invalid cancellations (thrash) is 15%. We omit the fact that in other networks, on the same offers, may process different CCs, and let's assume that all the same theoretically with them is identical.

In our network you leaked 27 leads, of which:

10 didn't pick up the phone.

5 - wrong person

4 - number is busy

4 - tests

2 - duplicates

1 - wanted to buy another product

1 - no phone number.

The total is 11 valid cancellations and 16 invalid (tresh).

Consequently, with 11 valid cancellations 15% uproof, in the best-case scenario, is 1-2 uproofed leads.

I'm sure, as experienced arbitrators, you know that 20 leads in the test is doubtful indicative volume, especially on the push source of traffic. But even if it's true, the probability that this 20 leads will get those 1-2 uproots, on the adalt offere, according to the geography of Indonesia - 50/50. I believe the numbers and math we will not challenge.

Let's move on.

2. On the second offerer Suprema, what concerns payments.

You have apruva on which there was no payment, namely, 2 apruva from one office and 1 apruva from the second.

Translating this into cash equivalent: $ 22 and $ 11 respectively.

In a private office, each publisher of our affiliate network, spelled out the rules regarding the minimum amount for withdrawal, I enclose a screenshot http://joxi.ru/v29nPW6iZE... . This is the answer to repeated questions as to why the manager was unable to provide you with such payments - it is not in his competence and goes against the rules of our affiliate network.

3. Deadline for closing the issue.

From December 24, for at least 5 days were in a dial-up, in connection with the holidays until January 8, we were waiting for the unloading of details of your leads, in order to thoroughly and fairly understand what kind of leads and what comments on the dialing of these leads gave the KC.

January 8th manager reset you as requested unloading on Alphamax, and additionally on the second offer Suprema, in order to completely eliminate misunderstandings.

Unfortunately we had a dialogue with you on all the above only yesterday, January 23, as soon as you were able to get in touch.

Summing up, I think our analysis of the situation is more than reasoned and detailed with both screenshots and numbers.

In order not to develop polemics, as an exception to the rules of our network, you will be paid all the current amounts on the balances of your accounts: $ 22 and $ 11 respectively.

Very sorry that this situation has arisen in principle, we are always most loyal to all our publishers and are open to any dialogue, as well as protecting their interests. Unfortunately, our further cooperation is not possible, objectively for each of the parties, so I propose at the present moment to end it.