Explain the situation from our side.
Partner was driving traffic traffic from November 22 to January 21 with an average of 10-15 leads per day. It was said that the traffic was driving traffic through Facebook on the app.
On the 21st of January the advertiser sent us feedback on the traffic with a suspicion of insent. In this case we block the partner's account and restrict access until the situation is clarified.
What we found out about the situation:
- 90% of users with only one session
- Active users - 0% (this is nearly 500 leads)
- 0 % of purchases
- Our system is detecting the last domain from which the traffic came, and we see that 80% of the traffic was from Vkontakte. We are assuming an ad/group was placed there to generate innent traffic. http://joxi.net/MAjwB6ZTk...
- The partner had 20% of the traffic coming from IOS, OS X. Android priles don't go to Android users from iPhone. But ok. This is only possible if the partner also took an IOS prilla. We contacted the manager of MagicApps and they don't have IOS apps at all.
Taking into account all the factors described above, we came to the conclusion that the partner generated motivated traffic which is not allowed in our partner network. We do not pay for such traffic and block partners' access to our affiliate network
Leads were paid till the 23rd of December. The cut was made for the leads from November 23rd to January 21st (388$).
We could be wrong, but is it enough clicks for the test?
In contrast, attached the results of our partner on the same smartlink, which you tested on the same dates http://joxi.ru/Grq99wDfkE...
Thank you for your comments on the technical functionality of the affiliate! We will definitely take into account when improving the partner's admin panel.
You drove traffic traffic from May 19, testing 4 offers ("big amount"), not counting two smartlinks. The first three offers, you drove traffic 425, 807 and 1366 clicks respectively, but everywhere there was one conversion and that the test. On these offerers we have daily leaked hundreds of conversions without complaint. Therefore, there is a suspicion that the cause is not in offers but in the quality of your traffic.
The offerer you were testing from May 29 till June 10. Most of our traffic (334 conversions out of 420) was generated from June 6th (Thu) till June 10th (Mon). On the 7th of June we got feedback from the advertiser stating that the traffic was not paid off at all and users were inactive. After that we asked for the flood analysis (on Fri), because we were working with you for the first time and you were not informed about it. On the weekend advertiser does not give feedback, so it came on the 10th of Monday. My fears were confirmed and the feedback from the advertiser showed a fraud. The screenshot below.
We are very tough and uncompromising approach to partners who are trying to cheat the advertiser and forged. That is why advertisers trust us and give us the best conditions.
Reasons for refusal of requests for offers:
- Illogical choice of offers. You made requests for offers from completely different verticals and different geo. You chose them based on pay per lead, since all of these offers have a payout of $10 or more. This shows that you are not guided by the vertical, and correspondence of your traffic sources, but only by the level of payout, which is quite unprofessional.
- We do not know the quality of your traffic. And we provide only verified partners with such payouts.
- your testing of the available offers looks like this. http://joxi.net/D2P00Zkiq... I think there is no need to comment.
- And lastly. Are you talking about 10 registrations? Are you so sure that there are 10? How can you be so sure? Maybe you made them yourself?
We wish you success, Nicholas)
We are sure that your quality is top and wish to continue the same to develop and earn even more) Maybe one day we will work with Tir-1)