I came to RevenueLab from another iGaming network with traffic from SEO + a bit of Telegram. The goal was simple: to find a network where there are normal brands for Poland and clear communication on the terms, especially if you go to Hybrid / RevShare. I have been working with them for about 2 months, during which time I have tested 2 brands and can describe what is really convenient and where it is better to “lay the straw" in advance.

What you liked (specifics)

According to the assortment, I liked that there are several large brands inside and you don't need to keep dozens of direct cabinets to compare conditions for one GEO. This saves time at the start, when you are testing different funnels and creatives in parallel.

According to the models, it's a plus that you can choose CPA/Hybrid/RevShare for your type of traffic, rather than relying on a single format. This is important for SEO: you can start with a Hybrid for a “fast cache”, and then see if RevShare's traffic pulls in quality.

Support: when you ask specific questions (caps, permitted sources, promo requirements, which landing pages are better converted to PL), the answers are usually relevant and without unnecessary “drive traffic”. This is especially critical for tests, because in iGaming, a delay of a day is sometimes worth a whole split.

Facts and figures (mini-case)

Source: SEO + Telegram (showcase/reviews + warming up posts)
GEO: Poland (PL)
Model: Hybrid (CPA+RevShareCPA+RevShare)
Period: 2025-10-20 — 2025-12-05

The result:

Clicks: 3,840

Registrations: 412

Deposits (FTD): 56

Income:  €2 170

ROI: 78% (after content and purchase of placements)

Payment: withdrawal was made 2 times, both times it arrived within 1-2 business days after confirmation.

Nuances (2 points that are better to know in advance)

If you are planning a RevShare/ Hybrid, specify the controversial points in writing in advance: taking into account the negative balance, the rules for high-roller, the fixation period and what is considered a valid player. This is not a “problem” with RevenueLab, but a standard risk area for any revar models - but when everything is fixed, then there are fewer discrepancies.

The second point is that communication is accelerated if you come not with a general “give conditions”, but immediately with the introductory ones: GEO, source, volume, promo format and a list of questions. If you need to start on the same day, I would duplicate the request to the official support/contact in order not to depend on one communication channel.

Result

I can recommend RevenueLab to those who have SEO/content or mixed traffic and who are willing to work within the rules of the model, especially on RevShare, fixing the key conditions in advance. It's also OK for beginners, but it's better to start with a short test for 2-3 weeks, keep the agreements and close the questions about the rules and sources before the spill.

I transferred the test mobile stream to VN, I wanted to understand how local sources keep the load. The first clicks were ragged, as if the algorithm couldn't capture the audience, but after the creative change, the response became softer. The leads started flowing in without any sudden jumps, and that calmed me down. The program's promotional materials turned out to be neatly assembled - I literally chose the right package and immediately launched the test. Interestingly, the early morning gave a better CR than the evening, so I left the bundle in rotation and am selecting a couple more options for expansion.

The ROI also behaved more calmly, reaching +18% after the first 1.2k clicks. After the second round of optimization, retention increased, and LTV pulled up to about x1.3 from the base model. What I liked was that the payments were predictable, as if by the clock, and the affiliate program does not cut the flow for no reason.
One of the advantages for me personally is deep statistics, the ability to keep several GEO with different rollback frequencies, and adequate technical support that does not go into templates. In general, after 12 months of rare but stable casting, it feels like the space allows itself to be scaled without drastic drawdowns.

Stable affiliate program. No unexpected changes in conditions, everything is clear and fair. I work with them calmly, without nerves. 
It is convenient and profitable to work in their main territories. 

It's not scary to test new bundles, it's not scary to increase budgets. Because you know that the manager won't go missing, and the payments will arrive on time. This confidence allows you to focus on your work, rather than on controlling your partner.


 

The personal account of the MelBet affiliate was pleasantly surprised by the convenience: The statistics are clear, the filters work perfectly, and uploads are fast. This helps you analyze the results and optimize your campaigns quickly. Payments are regular and without delays, which is important for scaling.

I work with a large number of partners, and the MelBet affiliate is one of those that always pleases with quality. Offers convert well, creatives are updated regularly, and managers give competent recommendations. Profitability is confidently high.

I recently started working with Megapari. I found out about this BC at the SiGMA event in Rome, where I was offered favorable terms, arranged the offer and immediately fitted in. The result for the first month: I am satisfied with everything, words do not differ from deeds.
I also praise the good support and special respect for the affiliated manager George — he helped a lot at the start.

The MelBet affiliate really cares about the partners. They helped me find the right monetization model, provided me with test budgets, and suggested optimal geos to start with. Thanks to this, I was able to quickly achieve a stable income without unnecessary risks.

Excellent affiliate program — the rates are above average, you can really earn money. The support is clear: if something went wrong, they solve it quickly, without unsubscribing. I'm glad that I came out to cooperate, now Lew is here all the time.

Sync.deals is a reliable and stable partner, which is very important in our market. They have a large portfolio of offers, ranging from financial to sweepstakes. Managers (they have a separate respect) actively help to find the most converting traffic sources, help in the analysis of offers and sort out our bays to find the hooks. Somehow the advertiser made a mistake in the postbacks and we drove traffic on him for the wrong article, the guys from Sync met us halfway without any questions and fully reimbursed the loss. And also, they have approved their sync.deals domain from Google, which confirms their status as a reliable and professional partner, and makes it easier for us to launch and moderate offers through the guys. Working with Sync is an investment in stable income and high–quality support.

when I decided to reallocate the budget, I took a small step aside to check how 1win would behave with average volumes. at first, I thought that I would just have to sit for days and catch distortions, but the schedules turned out to be calmer. The depth of the statistics allowed me to see micro-deviations, and I gradually transferred some of the traffic from native to a mixed format.
One of the interesting points was the behavior of traffic on Asian geo sites: no unexpected cross-sections, and this is rare. payments went according to schedule, without sudden delays. I even noted that convenient promos help save time on preparing creo for rotations. The structure of the materials is consistent, there are no outdated templates.
the support in one dialogue was able to synchronize with me an understanding of exactly where the filter clings in my tracking. a nice detail: there was no unnecessary rush, and the answers were given on the case.
now I'm thinking of gently expanding the test: not chasing rapid growth, but seeing how new sources behave. a calm, even experience. 

We have been working as a team with Kingfin for several years now.
There have never been any problems with verifications or payments. Managers are always in touch at tg, if you have any questions about reconciliation, they always respond quickly.

The registration is very simple, unlike the gambling partners, where you need to leave a request and wait for the payment from the managers of the gambling company. It all took less than 5 minutes, just log in, confirm your email and fill in all the required fields for verification.
The manager contacted me immediately and we discussed the start of work.

I've been with pin-up for about 4 years now, and overall I'm really happy!
The stats do not lag, payments come steadily, managers react quickly without unnecessary red tape. The offers are working, the ratio is also OK. There are a couple of things that can be fixed, so I put 8 out of 10, but in general, the partner is strong and it's very pleasant to work. 

I caught myself thinking that for a long time I wanted to try to work through another direction, where I could test hypotheses without haste. I started with a simple one: I chose an average competitive offer, set a moderate daily limit, and decided to see how the stream would behave without harsh edits. The first hours went smoothly, but without any pronounced movement, such a "quiet corridor" when statistics change barely noticeably.
To shake up the bundle a little, I changed some of the promotional materials: I replaced the old set of banners with new ones, where the text is shorter and the visual is more neutral. This resulted in a slight but steady increase in CR. Not a jerk, but rather a smooth upward slope is exactly what allows you to calmly plan the next iteration.
I liked that the panel provides in-depth statistics: you can watch not only the general stream, but also the breakdown into small time windows. This helps to catch the moments of drawdown while they are still small. Plus, there is a separate scheduled withdrawals plus; it is convenient when you can understand in advance on which day the next cycle will close.
When the test was already gaining momentum, I tried to slightly expand the geo. The reaction turned out to be mild: traffic was not cut off, but simply switched to a different distribution. This calm behavior of the system creates the feeling that you have space to try without too much pressure.
As a result, the bundle began to develop predictably, without harsh emotions, rather like a confident work routine.

At first, there was no plan: there were a couple of creos under the KZ that were lying idle, and I decided to drive traffic at least something in order to understand whether the bundle was alive or not. Nothing happened for the first few hours, I already thought it would go to zero again, but towards evening the clicks increased, and the next day the first Kazakh drone arrived. Not to say that the result is a fire, but after a couple of unsuccessful launches, it cheered up a bit. I scrolled for another day, connected the tg bot, and suddenly started bringing in 1-2 leads without a wild expense. I liked that the statistics are going smoothly and the traffic is not being cut off: you can see which segments are failing and which are holding on. So far, this is the best thing for tests: it does not give illusions, but it shows where to really move and what can be done so that the bundle does not fall apart on the second day.

We'll remove the mouth guards, which is convenient. I asked for a custom bonus for the players, they quickly set everything up. The statistics on the players are detailed, I see a full layout for each player's action.

There was a period when there was a big drop in one type of traffic. I wrote to the manager in the bos, although it was Saturday evening, the two of us spent an hour and a half sorting out the bundles. As a result, we found a weak spot, it turned out to be a very cool interaction experience, I just got high.

I've been trying this partner tracker for some time now, and overall the impression was calm but confidently positive. I came in without high expectations, I just wanted to understand where the traffic merges and what really gives a return. As a result, I set up the basic parameters, and the picture immediately became clearer: you can see which channels are being pulled, and where there is only noise. I liked that the interface doesn't press unnecessary buttons, you can quickly look at the dynamics and not stick to the numbers for half a day. Plus, the reports are updated normally, without strange delays. While I've left it on the main stack, it helps to keep the workflow in order.