December 10, 2020
  • Support 1
  • Technology 4
  • Quality of offers 6
  • Reliability 1

I've found an offer ggbet (cupis) on favorable terms ($60) per baseline

I’ve decided to join, we've agreed that I will pour the traffic from fb, I've added creatives and started.
I started driving traffic in the beginning of November till about November 23 (test kpi is 15, after my traffic stopped I got the leads –around 20 in general)

Drove traffic of 20 leads on the sum of $ 1210 ($10 there was a promotion)

And then in telegram they rename the channel to ID/BAN, I think: what? Why I was banned?
They write to me: @vyachleonov: Your traffic was deemed as a fraud and will not be paid, the account goes to the ban. If you try to create a second account, it will be found at once and it will go to ban as well.

Do not even ask for screenshots and creatives, just ban. Although I have everything they can ask.

I think, well, now we'll figure it out and everything will be okay. But no))). Support is just retarded, as it seems to me. In the chat there were 4 people @tiawin, @vyachleonov, @Koshkax and me (@greshnik_pes). I wrote in the chat something like what's up, let's figure it out.
Do not read.
Wrote to each in private, do not read...

@Koshkax read and added to the Blacklist!!!! BLACKLISTED BY THE AFFILIATE WITHOUT ANSWERING!!!!!!!!!!!!! The other two do not even read. This is just an awful attitude!!!
They do not know how to speak humanely and dump them in blacklist (and this is support, you will not learn anything else from anywhere).
Scam for $1200, well, most likely GGbet paid, because I work not only with it and I have no complaints on the traffic, and these 3 goblins put it into their pocket
Thanks
NEVER WORK WITH THEM!!!!!!!
PAYMENT IS $5-10 MORE BUT I LOST $1210!
BETTER FIND A GOOD affiliate program WITH A SMALLER PAYOUT, BUT WHERE PEOPLE WORK, NOT THIS ONE

TG @greshnik_pes
TG @greshnik_pes
This is general chat

this @Koshkax

and this

Translated from the original

This review reflects the subjective opinion of the user, and not the official position of the editors.