PartnerkinPartnerkin
KYC & ComplianceIdentity VerificationFull public per-check pricing
iDenfy logo

iDenfy Review

6.6/10

Kaunas-based identity verification and AML vendor (iDenfy UAB, founded 2017) that is the pricing-transparency anchor of the segment: it publishes a fully itemized per-check schedule ($1.35 base, every add-on listed, a $0.55 enterprise floor) and bills only for approved checks, with nothing on its incident record, but carries no DIATF and no US gaming registration and exactly one named gambling operator (TOPsport) at a bootstrapped ~50-60-person scale.

  • Founded 2017
  • HQ Kaunas, Lithuania
  • 55+ team
  • Startup
  • Verified Jul 12, 2026
Our take

The reason to shortlist iDenfy is money you can see: it is the only tier-1 identity-verification vendor that publishes a fully itemized per-check schedule, a $1.35 base check, every add-on listed (liveness +$0.20, sanctions and PEPs +$0.45, proof of address +$0.90, manual review +$0.45), and a $0.55 enterprise floor, and it bills only for approved verifications so failed and abandoned attempts are free, which lets a buyer model cost before a sales call. Underneath sits a broad check surface with API, SDK, no-code, and white-label included at every tier, a clean incident record (no breach, lawsuit, fine, or layoff on record), and founder ownership with no absorbed-parent risk. The honest catches are real: no DIATF and no US gaming registration, every infosec certification asserted with no issuer behind it (the iBeta claim is engine-derived through FaceTec), exactly one named gambling operator on record (TOPsport), and a bootstrapped ~50-60-person scale carrying compliance-critical infrastructure.

USServedUKServed
9 yrsin marketDocument verification for ID documents from 200+ countries and territories, language-agnosticCoverage
Category
KYC & Compliance
Best for
SMBMid-market
Products
Identity Verification & OnboardingAML Screening & Ongoing MonitoringKYB Business VerificationDeveloper Platform & SDKs
Verticals
CasinoSportsbook
US / UK
US · ServedUK · Served
PricingOn request
OwnershipPrivate
Regions
EuropeNorth America
Verdict

Our read

6.6/10
GoodReviewed by Partnerkin ResearchJuly 2026
Verification coverage6.9

A full check spread on one integration: document across 200+ countries, passive and active liveness, age, address, AML with PEP and adverse-media, KYB, plus phone, NFC, bank, email, SMS-OTP, criminal check, and proxy detection, with API, SDK, no-code, and white-label included at every tier, though all timings and accuracy are vendor-stated and the liveness engine is FaceTec-derived.

Compliance & certifications5.8

The weakest verified trail in the tier: no DIATF, no US gaming register, the SOC 2 Type II issuer un-named, and ISO 27001, iBeta (engine-derived through FaceTec), ETSI, and eIDAS all asserted with no published certificate or report number, a real gap against every DIATF-certified or PA-registered peer.

Integration & delivery7.0

A full surface with no paywalling: REST API plus iOS and Android SDKs plus no-code KYC Theming and full white-label at the entry tier, a 14-day trial with 10 free checks, and a dense 2026 stream of European eID integrations plus Brazil CNH, with a 99.9% uptime SLA at Enterprise but no orchestration-canvas story.

Gaming footprint5.6

Thin against the framing: exactly one named gambling operator on record, TOPsport (Lithuania, CEO-quoted case study, partnership since 2017, 89% pass rate), while the gambling page's actual on-page testimonial is MGID, an ad-tech company rather than a gaming operator, with zero iGaming trade press and zero gaming announcements in the 2026 newsroom.

Trust & track record6.7

Clean through and through: no breach, lawsuit, fine, or layoff on record, rare in a category full of BIPA settlements, founder-owned with no absorbed-parent risk, and G2 4.9 across 190 reviews, with the load-bearing con a ~50-60-person scale and concentration risk and no institutional war chest for a compliance-critical dependency.

Commercials & transparency8.1

Category pricing gold: the only tier-1 vendor publishing a fully itemized per-check schedule ($1.35 base, $0.55 enterprise floor, every add-on listed, liveness +$0.20, AML +$0.45, PoA +$0.90, manual review +$0.45) and pay-only-for-approved billing, so buyers can model cost before a sales call.

Methodology. Our own score, a weighted average of six dimensions, tilted toward verification coverage and compliance. Scored on the identity-verification weighting, where verification coverage leads at 0.22 and compliance and certifications follows at 0.20, so a category-gold commercials score and a clean record lift the read while the weakest verified certification trail in the tier and a one-operator gaming footprint pull it back to the middle of the field. Read the full methodology

Strengths
  • Radical pricing transparency: the only tier-1 IDV vendor publishing a full itemized per-check schedule, a $1.35 base check, every add-on listed, and a $0.55 enterprise floor, so a buyer can model cost before a sales call (pricing page, 2026-07-11).
  • Pay only for approved verifications: failed, abandoned, and fraudulent attempts are free rather than billed per attempt, an unusual and buyer-favorable billing model stated as a standing feature.
  • A genuinely clean record: no breach, lawsuit, regulatory fine, or layoff on public record (checked 2026-07-11), rare in a category full of BIPA settlements and breaches, and founder-owned with no absorbed-parent risk.
  • All-tier feature parity: API, mobile SDKs, no-code flows, and full white-label are included even at the entry tier, extended by no-code KYC Theming (May 2026) and a dense 2026 stream of European eID integrations.
Watch-outs
  • The weakest verified compliance trail in the tier: no DIATF, no US gaming registration, and every infosec cert asserted rather than issuer-anchored, the SOC 2 Type II auditor is un-named, ISO 27001 has no published certificate, and the iBeta Level 2 claim is engine-derived through FaceTec, with no first-party iDenfy report.
  • A thin gaming footprint against the framing: gambling pages exist, but exactly one named gambling operator is on record (TOPsport), the gambling page's actual on-page testimonial is from MGID, an ad-tech company and not a gaming operator, and the 2026 newsroom carries zero gaming announcements.
  • No US gaming credibility despite the US push: iDenfy is not on the PA PGCB list, and the Delaware office (2024-11-29) targets fintech and crypto, with gaming outside its brief, so a US-regulated operator has no state-registered vendor trail to point to.
  • Scale and concentration risk: a bootstrapped ~50-60-person vendor (EMIS reports 50 in 2025 against a press-kit 60+) carries compliance-critical infrastructure with no institutional backing, a different risk class than Sumsub, Jumio, or Socure for a critical dependency.
Best for

Small-to-mid operators and platforms that want transparent, model-able per-check pricing, pay-only-for-approved economics, fast European eID coverage, and an included KYB and AML monitoring bundle without enterprise-sales opacity.

Not for

US-regulated sportsbooks and casinos that need a state-registered vendor or a DIATF certificate, and very large operators that weight a deep-pocketed counterparty and audited financials heavily against a bootstrapped ~50-60-person vendor.

Where you can run it

Markets & licensing

iDenfy's compliance picture is the weakest verified trail in the identity-verification tier, and the gap is not a missing gambling license (none exists for an IDV vendor) but the absence of any issuer-anchored anchor at all. There is no UK DIATF certification (re-confirmed no evidence 2026-07-11), which every other tier-1 IDV vendor holds, and no US state gaming registration, iDenfy is not on the PA PGCB certified or registered list, which is expected for an EU-centric vendor with no geolocation product. The infosec claims stack up on paper (SOC 2 Type II announced 2024-12-10, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ETSI TS 119 461, eIDAS) but every one grades claimed only: the SOC 2 auditor is un-named, no ISO issuer certificate is published, and the iBeta Level 2 presentation-attack claim is engine-derived through FaceTec 3D (the party actually iBeta-certified) rather than a first-party iDenfy report. Enterprise-tier assurances (up to $500K cyber insurance under Lloyd's of London cover, a 99.9% uptime SLA, up to 8-year data retention) are real contract terms but not certifications.

United States
US push, but not for gaming

iDenfy opened a Delaware office on 2024-11-29 and tied its SOC 2 Type II announcement to US-market expansion, but the target industries named were financial services and crypto trading, not gaming. There is no US state gaming registration on record and no PA PGCB entry, so a US-regulated sportsbook or casino that needs a named state-registered vendor has no trail to point to here despite the US strategy. Operators that need a PA PGCB or MGC supplier entry should look at the register-anchored specialists in this directory.

United Kingdom
No DIATF, a real gap

iDenfy holds no UK DIATF certification and no OfDIA register entry was found (re-confirmed 2026-07-11), which is a hard gap against Sumsub, Veriff, Jumio, Entrust, and IDnow, all of which are DIATF-certified or accredited. For a UK operator that treats DIATF as the entry ticket, that absence is decision-relevant, and the ETSI and eIDAS assertions are claimed only, which does not substitute for it.

B2B licenses
UK DIATFUnited Kingdom
Not certified: no DIATF register entry or certification-body trail found · Re-confirmed no evidence 2026-07-11, a real gap against every DIATF-certified tier-1 IDV peer
US state gaming registrationUnited States
None: not on the PA PGCB certified or registered gaming service provider list, and no US state gaming vendor registration held · Expected for an EU-centric IDV vendor with no geolocation product. The Delaware office (2024-11-29) targets fintech and crypto
SOC 2 Type IIAICPA (issuer un-named)
Vendor-stated, announced tied to US-market expansion and the Delaware office · Announced 2024-12-10 (FinTech Alliance), auditor and issuer not named publicly, so claimed only
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ETSI TS 119 461, eIDASISO / ETSI / EU standards
Asserted in the press kit as compliance positions · No issuer certificate, registrar, or report number published on-site, so all grade claimed only (2026-07-11)
iBeta Level 2 (ISO/IEC 30107-3 PAD)iBeta Quality Assurance
Presentation-attack detection asserted, but engine-derived through the FaceTec 3D liveness engine integrated in 2020 · FaceTec is the iBeta-certified party, no first-party iDenfy test report number surfaced, so claimed only

Licensing tier: No verified anchor of any kind: unlike the DIATF-certified and PA-registered peers, iDenfy carries no DIATF, no US gaming registration, and no issuer-anchored infosec certificate, and every cert on record (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, iBeta Level 2, ETSI, eIDAS) is asserted with no published certificate, registrar, or report number, with the iBeta claim engine-derived through FaceTec.

Live & certified markets
EU (Kaunas, Lithuania base, EU-based processing)US (Delaware office opened 2024-11-29, fintech and crypto focus)Global IDV/AML/KYB coverage across fintech, banking, crypto, forex, lending, and gaming

The footprint is a compliance layer operators integrate, not a licensed operating jurisdiction: EU-based processing out of Lithuania, a US expansion aimed at fintech and crypto, and a general-purpose IDV/AML/KYB product sold across many verticals (2026-07-11).

No restricted-market list applies: iDenfy sells verification software and holds no gambling licenses, and its footprint is EU-first out of Kaunas with a 2024 Delaware office aimed at fintech and crypto (2026-07-12).

Under the hood

Platform & capabilities

The feature set: what's built in. Capabilities light up when present. Anything not shown isn't offered or isn't disclosed.

Risk & compliance
Risk managementKYC / AMLTransaction monitoringMulti-jurisdiction
How it connects

Integrations & engineering

One contract and one API instead of a separate deal per studio, feed, or PSP. Here's what connects, how fast, and on what stack.

Distinctive fieldThis map rests on iDenfy's public pricing and product pages, its 2026 newsroom, and the TOPsport case study, with the caveat that the vendor publishes no casino-platform connector directory.
One unified API

Everything funnels through one integration: a REST API for a custom build, native iOS and Android SDKs for embedded flows, or no-code onboarding journeys for teams without engineering time. Document, liveness, age, address, AML, and KYB checks ride the same connection, full white-label is included at every tier and extended by no-code KYC Theming (May 2026), and Enterprise adds a dedicated account manager, KYB and AML monitoring as standard, and a 99.9% uptime SLA. A 14-day trial with 10 free checks lets a team prove the flow before signing.

Time to integrate

No firm vendor integration-time claim is published (2026-07-11). The public documentation, the no-code flows, and the 14-day free trial let engineering and product start immediately, so the real calendar depends on the check mix and rule tuning rather than a stated SLA.

Named gaming client
The single load-bearing gambling reference, via a case study with an operator quote
TOPsport (Lithuania), 20+ year betting operator running retail and online casino plus sportsbook, partnership since 2017, with CEO Dainius Gulbinas quotedThe gambling page's actual on-page testimonial is from MGID (Oleksandr Nazarenko), an ad-tech company rather than a gaming operator, so it is not a gambling clientZero iGaming trade-press coverage and zero gaming announcements in the 2026 newsroom
eID and regional integrations
The dense 2026 momentum, all non-gaming (from the newsroom, checked 2026-07-11)
Handy-Signatur (Austria), FTN (Finland), .beID (Belgium), Mobile-ID (Estonia and Lithuania), Verimi (Germany eID), Dutch BSN maskingBrazil Digital CNH e-driver's license (2026-07-07)RATO Bank selected iDenfy for identity verification and AML in a new mobile banking app (fintech.global, 2026-05-18)GlolinkOTC crypto platform, enhanced due diligence (2024-11)
Cross-edge to verify
Recorded in the payments and geo sweep, not on iDenfy's own newsroom page 1
An iDenfy and Nuxgame mention dated 2026-04, the only iGaming-platform cross-edge candidate
Developer surface
The public half of the offer
REST API with public developer documentation (documentation.idenfy.com class)Native iOS and Android SDKs plus no-code onboarding flows and no-code KYC Theming (May 2026)14-day free trial with 10 free identity verification checks before any contract
Stack:REST API for server-side integrationNative iOS and Android mobile SDKsNo-code onboarding flows and no-code KYC Theming white-labelingFaceTec 3D liveness engine, integrated 2020Full white-label included at every tier
Product stack

Products & tools

One integration for the whole onboarding job: document verification across 200+ countries, passive or active liveness with face match, age and address checks, AML screening with ongoing monitoring, and KYB business verification, with API, SDKs, no-code, and full white-label included at every pricing tier.

Track record

On the record

The history that matters: the milestones, the scale, the awards, and who runs it.

iDenfy UAB, a Lithuanian private limited company, was incorporated 2017-08-25 in Kaunas by Domantas Ciulde (CEO and co-founder), and is headquartered at Griciupio g. 7-212, Kaunas, with offices listed in Lithuania, the UK, and the US. The company is organically grown with no institutional venture round of note, funding is listed as not disclosed and trackers show no priced rounds, which makes it a bootstrapped, founder-owned counterpoint to the PE- and VC-backed field. The core business is general-purpose RegTech, KYC identity verification plus KYB business verification plus AML compliance, sold across fintech, banking, crypto, forex, lending, healthcare and insurance, and gaming, so gaming is one vertical among many rather than the core, and the 2026 news stream is dominated by banking and eID rather than betting. Revenue is registry-derived only, with EMIS citing net sales up about 60% in 2023, and no audited public financials exist. The seed record named a founding CTO (Gediminas Ratkevicius) who is no longer on the current leadership page, so the stable anchor is Ciulde as CEO and co-founder.

9 yearsTrack record
~50-60Headcount
1,000+Client count
200+Country coverage
~+60% net sales (2023)Revenue growth (est.)
BootstrappedOwnership

Brands & clients on the platform

TOPsportRATO BankGlolinkOTCMGID

Corporate

Legal entity
iDenfy UAB
Countries served
200
Product lines
Identity VerificationAML Screening & MonitoringKYB Business VerificationDynamic KYB WorkflowKYC Theming

Leadership

Domantas Ciulde
CEO and Co-founder · since 2017
Andrius Sulskis
COO · since 2017
Adomas Vitkauskas
CPO · since 2017

Milestones

  1. iDenfy UAB is incorporated in Kaunas, Lithuania (2017-08-25) by Domantas Ciulde as an identity verification and AML platform, and the TOPsport betting partnership begins the same year.

  2. Integrates FaceTec 3D biometric liveness detection, the engine behind the later iBeta Level 2 presentation-attack claim.

  3. Launches a new KYB verification system with data cross-matching (November), opens a Delaware, USA office (2024-11-29) targeting financial services and crypto, and announces SOC 2 Type II tied to US-market expansion (2024-12-10).

  4. EMIS reports about 50 employees, and vendor and registry materials cite net sales up about 60% for 2023, with the company still bootstrapped and founder-owned.

  5. Ships a dense stream of European eID integrations (Austria, Finland, Belgium, Estonia, Lithuania, Germany, Netherlands) plus Brazil CNH, launches no-code KYC Theming (May) and a commission-based Partner Program, and wins G2 Summer 2026 badges including Best Digital Customer Onboarding, with zero gaming announcements in the newsroom.

Where they're pushing next

  • US financial services and crypto, via the Delaware office (2024-11-29), rather than gaming
  • European eID scheme coverage, a dense 2026 integration stream across seven-plus countries plus Brazil CNH
  • KYB business verification and the Dynamic KYB Workflow, enhanced in 2026

Awards & recognition

G2 Summer 2026 badges, including Best Digital Customer Onboarding
win2026
Due diligence

Trust signals

The checks an operator runs before signing: incidents, enforcement, ownership, and longevity, from our research.

9 yrsTrack record
Security incidents
None
Regulatory actions
None
Litigation
None
Financial stability
Unknown
Ownership transparency
Clear
Client longevity
Mixed
Key people public
Yes
Clients verifiable
Verifiable
Complaint patterns (from public reviews)
  • OCR struggles on unclear or damaged documents
  • credits expiring too quickly plus billing friction
  • occasional false rejections on valid documents
How it stacks up

iDenfy vs alternatives

The same attributes, side by side, from our normalized provider set, useful for seeing where this vendor fits against its peers.

AttributeiDenfySumsubShufti ProVeriff
Founded2017201520172015
Team55+500+177+
US marketAvailableAvailable
PricingPublicPublicPublicNot published
Country coverageDocument verification for ID…Document-free verification in…240+ countries230+ countries
UK DIATFNot certifiedCertified IDSPNoneUK DIATF gamma

The take: iDenfy is the pricing-transparency contrast in the tier: it publishes an even finer per-check schedule than Sumsub, itemizing every add-on and a $0.55 enterprise floor, and it bills only for approved checks, but its certification trail is the weakest in the field with no DIATF and every cert claimed only. Sumsub is the direct comparison, larger, DIATF-certified, and carrying named operators, while Shufti Pro is the other small published-price vendor but is PA-Certified with a named gaming client. Pick iDenfy when transparent, model-able pricing and pay-only-for-approved economics outweigh a register-anchored certification trail and a deep gaming roster.

Commercials

Pricing & terms

iDenfy publishes pricing. Ranges are below, and final terms are quoted per project.

Pay-as-you-go $1.35/verification (min from $135/month). Enterprise from $0.55/verification (quote-only). Add-ons: sanctions and PEPs +$0.45, proof of address +$0.90, manual review +$0.45, 3D liveness +$0.20, IP proxy +$0.12, duplicate detection +$0.10, approved-only result +$0.50. Billed for approved verifications only, 14-day trial with 10 free checks (2026-07-11)

Demo / sandbox available

Turnkey

ModelOn request
Setup feeOn request

White-label

ModelOn request
Setup feeOn request
Request commercials
Working with them

Support & account management

The service layer operators inherit: availability, the channels support runs on, and language coverage.

Dedicated account managerB2B support99.9%uptimeSLA99.9% uptime SLA guarantee at Enterprise (2026-07-11)
Channels
EmailLive chat
Questions

Frequently asked

The things operators actually ask before signing.

What does iDenfy actually cost per verification, all-in?+

iDenfy is the one tier-1 IDV vendor that lets you answer this from a public page. As of 2026-07-11 the pay-as-you-go base is $1.35 per verification with a minimum from $135/month, including ID, face match, liveness, full white-label, and API, SDK, and no-code access. Add-ons are itemized: sanctions and PEPs +$0.45, proof of address +$0.90, manual review +$0.45, 3D face liveness +$0.20, IP proxy risk +$0.12, face and document duplicate detection +$0.10, and approved-only result verification +$0.50. A gambling operator adding liveness, AML, proof of address, and manual review can model the all-in check cost directly. The Enterprise tier prices from a $0.55 per-verification floor (quote-only) and bundles KYB, AML monitoring, up to $500K cyber insurance, a 99.9% uptime SLA, up to 8-year data retention, and annual rollover of unused checks. Billing charges only for approved verifications, so failed and abandoned attempts are free, and a 14-day trial includes 10 free checks.

Which gambling operators use iDenfy, and how thin is the gaming footprint?+

Exactly one named gambling operator is on record with evidence: TOPsport, Lithuania's 20+ year betting operator, running retail locations plus an online casino and sportsbook, in partnership since 2017. The case study cites a vendor-stated 89% pass rate, 30% cost savings on AML, KYC, and screening automation, and 5,000+ active users AML-monitored daily, with TOPsport CEO Dainius Gulbinas quoted. The catch is that the gambling page's actual on-page customer testimonial is from MGID, a native-advertising and ad-tech company rather than a gaming operator, so it is not a gambling reference. There is no dedicated iGaming trade-press coverage, and the 2026 newsroom carries zero gaming announcements, so the gambling framing rests on one betting operator.

Does iDenfy hold any US state gaming registration or UK DIATF certification?+

No to both. iDenfy is not on the Pennsylvania PGCB certified or registered gaming service provider list and holds no US state gaming vendor registration, which is expected for an EU-centric vendor with no geolocation product but means there is no US-lens gaming trail despite the Delaware office (opened 2024-11-29, targeting fintech and crypto). It also holds no UK DIATF certification and no OfDIA register entry was found (re-confirmed 2026-07-11), a real gap against Sumsub, Veriff, Jumio, Entrust, and IDnow, all of which are DIATF-certified or accredited.

Are the SOC 2, ISO 27001, and iBeta claims independently certified?+

None of them is issuer-anchored, so treat them as claimed only. SOC 2 Type II was announced on 2024-12-10 tied to US-market expansion, but the auditor and issuer are not named publicly. ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ETSI TS 119 461, and eIDAS are asserted in the press kit with no issuer certificate, registrar, or report number published on-site. The iBeta Level 2 presentation-attack claim is engine-derived: iDenfy's liveness engine is FaceTec 3D (integrated 2020), and FaceTec is the party actually iBeta-certified, with no first-party iDenfy test report number surfaced. The one clean part of the trust picture is the incident record, no breach, lawsuit, fine, or layoff on record as of 2026-07-11.