PartnerkinPartnerkin
KYC & ComplianceIdentity VerificationDeepfake-defense IDV engine
AU10TIX logo

AU10TIX Review

5.8/10

A 2002 Israeli identity-verification vendor whose real edge is deepfake and injection-attack detection, majority-owned by SEC-reporting ICTS International (66.30% at Dec 2025), PA-Registered and on the UK DIATF register, but carrying an audited 31.5% revenue collapse to $31.5M with a $12.2M loss (FY2025 20-F), a 2024 credential-exposure incident, a breach disclosure rewritten a year later, and a single named gaming operator (888).

  • Founded 2002
  • HQ Tel Aviv, Israel
  • B2B-only
  • Verified Jul 12, 2026
Our take

AU10TIX is the tier's cautionary review: its deepfake and injection-attack detection is a real differentiator built for exactly the synthetic-fraud threat that defines remote onboarding in 2026, but it sits on top of a declining business and the thinnest gaming footprint of the identity-verification set. The parent ICTS International's audited FY2025 20-F (filed April 2026) shows the AU10TIX segment's revenue falling 31.5% from $46.0M to $31.5M and swinging to a $12.2M loss, with the filing citing lost customers, while the gaming record rests on a single named operator (888 Holdings). Layered on top are a 2024 credential-exposure incident and a breach disclosure rewritten a year later, so a buyer gets proven synthetic-fraud technology from a PA-Registered, DIATF-listed vendor whose trust and stability signals are the weakest in the field.

USServedUKServed
24 yrsin market2Regulated markets
Category
KYC & Compliance
Best for
Mid-marketEnterprise
Products
Identity Verification SuiteDeepfake & Injection-Attack DetectionAML, PEP & Sanctions Screening
Verticals
CasinoSportsbook
US / UK
US · ServedUK · Served
PricingOn request
OwnershipPart of ICTS International N.V.
Verdict

Our read

5.8/10
MixedReviewed by Partnerkin ResearchJuly 2026
Verification coverage6.8

A modular IDV and authentication engine (document, biometric with liveness, AI age estimation, proof of address, eKYC, AML/PEP/sanctions, POS) whose edge is deepfake and injection-attack detection (multi-layer AI on metadata, visual, and behavioral signals), with under-8-second and 98%-completion figures vendor-stated, coverage counts not published, and no orchestration or reusable-ID play.

Compliance & certifications6.7

PA PGCB Registered (AU10TIX Ltd., exp 04/12/2027, the lower class, not Certified) plus a UK OfDIA DIATF register presence (page 1 confirmed), while the UKGC, AMLD, UIGEA, and KOSA name-drops are marketing rather than approvals and ISO 27001 is claimed only, a two-register trail but nothing higher.

Integration & delivery6.0

API plus SDK with mobile document capture, but integration details are gated behind sales with no open developer portal (contrast GBG's docs.go.gbgplc.com), no named platform or PSP integrations surfaced, and no reusable-KYC or orchestration story, the thinnest delivery surface of the in-tier vendors.

Gaming footprint5.2

The thinnest named-operator footprint of the in-tier vendors: exactly one named operator, 888 Holdings (a case study with a Director-level quote), plus the register and DIATF presence, so it clears the bar of a live gaming page and a named operator, but a single client alongside the audited customers-were-lost note makes gaming a con rather than a strength.

Trust & track record4.9

The review's center of gravity and the only sub-5 dimension in the segment: audited revenue down 31.5% ($46.0M to $31.5M) plus a $12.2M segment loss (ICTS FY2025 20-F, filing citing customer losses), the 2024 credential-exposure incident (404 Media, June 2024, admin credentials exposed over a year, still working when tested, PII and ID-image links for TikTok/Uber/X users), and the breach disclosure rewritten a year later, the 2025 no-production-connection account narrowing the 2024 reporting and the company's own 2024 potentially-accessible admission.

Commercials & transparency4.4

No public pricing, enterprise sales only, the opaque camp shared with GBG, Socure, and Prove and the opposite of the iDenfy and Shufti Pro publish-the-price approach (Jul 2026).

Methodology. Our own score, a weighted average of six dimensions, tilted toward verification coverage and compliance. Weighted on the identity-verification scale, where verification coverage leads at 0.22 and compliance and certifications follows at 0.20, so a strong deepfake-detection engine and a two-register trail lift the top dimensions while an audited revenue decline, a security incident, a breach disclosure rewritten a year later, and a one-operator gaming footprint hold the score at the segment floor. Read the full methodology

Strengths
  • Deepfake and injection-attack detection depth is where AU10TIX leads: multi-layer AI across image metadata, visual anomalies, and behavioral patterns, built and marketed hard for the synthetic-identity and deepfake threat that defines remote onboarding in 2026, a real edge over most of the tier.
  • Fast, automated verification for high-volume onboarding: results in under 8 seconds, a 98% completion rate, and 24-hour new-market deployment (vendor figures, Jul 2026), a speed-first positioning that suits operators pushing large sign-up volumes.
  • Unusual financial visibility for the tier: because majority parent ICTS International N.V. is SEC-reporting, AU10TIX segment revenue and profit are disclosed in audited 20-F filings, so a buyer can actually read the numbers, which is rare in a category where almost every peer keeps financials private.
  • A two-register footprint anchored in the US and UK: PA PGCB Registered (AU10TIX Ltd., exp 04/12/2027) plus a UK OfDIA DIATF statutory register presence (page 1 confirmed), a real regulated-market trail, and a full check spread (document, biometric with liveness, age estimation, proof of address, eKYC, AML) in one engine from a vendor operating since 2002.
Watch-outs
  • An audited revenue collapse: the parent ICTS International's FY2025 Form 20-F (filed 30 April 2026) shows the AU10TIX authentication segment's revenue falling 31.5% from $46.0M in 2024 to $31.5M in 2025 and swinging to a $12.2M net loss after prior-year profit, with the filing stating in its own words that some customers were lost and activity declined, the rare filing-grade stability con in a tier that otherwise hides its numbers.
  • The 2024 credential-exposure incident: 404 Media reported in June 2024 that AU10TIX administrative credentials to a logging platform had been exposed online for over a year, harvested by infostealer malware from a NOC manager's machine and posted to Telegram, were still functional when tested in June 2024, and gave access to names, dates of birth, nationalities, ID numbers, document types, and links to ID-document images of end users verified for TikTok, Uber, and X.
  • The breach disclosure rewritten a year later (our finding): AU10TIX's July 2025 retrospective statement describes a single set of previously compromised inactive employee credentials for a legacy log-management system with no connection to production systems and no evidence of data exposure, a softer account than the 2024 record, where the credentials still worked when tested and exposed links to real ID images and AU10TIX itself admitted PII was potentially accessible, a narrowing that reduces the apparent severity.
  • The thinnest named-gaming footprint of the identity-verification tier: exactly one named operator, 888 Holdings (a case study with a Director-level quote), with no other named regulated-gaming clients surfacing on the vendor site or in trade press (Jul 2026), which alongside the audited customers-were-lost note makes gaming a weak spot instead of a strength.
  • PA Registered rather than Certified, plus opaque ownership and pricing: AU10TIX holds the lower of Pennsylvania's two classes (a rung below GBG, Socure, and Shufti Pro), it is a private company under a thinly-traded OTCQB parent routed through a Netherlands holding company, it publishes no pricing, and ISO 27001 is asserted with no issuer certificate (claimed only).
Best for

Operators whose specific problem is deepfake and injection-attack fraud at onboarding, that want a full document, biometric, age, and AML spread in one fast automated engine, and that are comfortable with an enterprise-opaque vendor carrying a security-incident and revenue-decline history.

Not for

Operators who weight security-incident history and disclosure consistency heavily, need a deep named-operator gaming track record, want published pricing, or want a financially growing vendor, since AU10TIX is shrinking, PA-Registered below the Certified class, and thin on gaming clients.

Similar providers
Where you can run it

Markets & licensing

AU10TIX carries a register trail on both sides of the Atlantic, but at the lower rung on the US side. In the US, AU10TIX Ltd. is a Registered gaming service provider on Pennsylvania's PGCB list (as of 3/24/2026), description ID verification services, expiring 04/12/2027. PA distinguishes Certified from the lower Registered class, and AU10TIX holds Registered, a rung below GBG, Socure, and Shufti Pro, all of which are Certified. In the UK, AU10TIX Ltd. appears on the OfDIA statutory DIATF register (page 1, alongside Veriff and OCR Labs), without published per-service detail. The framework name-drops on the gaming page, UKGC, AMLD 5 and 6, UIGEA, GDPR, ISO 27001, and KOSA/SCOPE, are marketing rather than approvals, and ISO 27001 is asserted with no issuer certificate published.

United States
PA-Registered, the lower class

The US gaming registration is real but at the lower rung: AU10TIX Ltd. is a Registered, not Certified, gaming service provider on the PGCB list (as of 3/24/2026) for ID verification services, expiring 04/12/2027. That puts it a class below the Certified peers in the tier. US operators get a real state-register anchor in Pennsylvania, but per-state coverage beyond PA should be confirmed at contract, and the audited Americas-heavy revenue decline covered in the trust section is the backdrop a US buyer should weigh.

United Kingdom
On the DIATF register

AU10TIX Ltd. is present on the OfDIA Digital Identity and Attributes Trust Framework statutory register, on page 1 alongside Veriff and OCR Labs. The per-service detail (product names and confidence profiles) is not published in the register listing, so a UK operator should confirm the exact scope at contract. The register presence itself is real and is the stronger of the two anchors for a UK-facing operator.

B2B licenses
AU10TIX Ltd., PA PGCB registrationPennsylvania, United States
Registered gaming service provider, description ID verification services, held by AU10TIX Ltd. directly, at the lower of PA's two classes · On the Authorized Certified and Registered Gaming Service Providers List as of 3/24/2026 · Registered (lower class) · exp 04/12/2027 · entity listed at Hod Hasharon, 972
AU10TIX Ltd., OfDIA DIATF registerUnited Kingdom
Present on the statutory Digital Identity and Attributes Trust Framework register, the UK trust anchor for the identity products · Page 1 of the register (as of Mar 2026) alongside Veriff OU and OCR Labs/IDVerse · per-service detail not published in the listing

Licensing tier: Two registers, but the lower-value kind on the US side: PA Registered and not Certified, plus a UK DIATF page-1 presence without published per-service detail. Unusually for the tier, the parent files audited numbers (ICTS 20-F), but ISO 27001 is asserted on the gaming page with no issuer certificate published.

Certifications
ISO 27001 (asserted on the gaming page, no issuer certificate published, treat as claimed only, Jul 2026)
Live & certified markets
UK (OfDIA DIATF register, AU10TIX Ltd.)US (PA PGCB Registered as AU10TIX Ltd.)

The two register anchors are the checkable gaming footprint. AU10TIX serves customers predominantly in the United States per the parent 20-F, but the gaming-relevant registers are the PA registration and the UK DIATF entry (Jul 2026).

No restricted-market list applies: AU10TIX sells identity software out of Tel Aviv, and no gambling license attaches to it, so the register trail runs through Pennsylvania and the UK DIATF page instead (Jul 2026).

Under the hood

Platform & capabilities

The feature set: what's built in. Capabilities light up when present. Anything not shown isn't offered or isn't disclosed.

Risk & compliance
KYC / AMLMulti-jurisdiction
How it connects

Integrations & engineering

One contract and one API instead of a separate deal per studio, feed, or PSP. Here's what connects, how fast, and on what stack.

Distinctive fieldThis map rests on AU10TIX's public gaming and holdings pages, the parent ICTS filings, and the 404 Media incident reporting, since the vendor publishes no open developer portal or formal casino-platform connector directory (Jul 2026).
One unified API

AU10TIX integrates through an API plus SDK with mobile document capture, but the developer surface is gated behind sales rather than exposed as an open portal. The product is positioned as a verification and fraud-defense engine, document, biometric with liveness, age estimation, proof of address, eKYC, and AML screening fronted by deepfake and injection-attack detection, rather than a no-code orchestration canvas of the Sumsub or GBG GO kind, and reusable KYC or passporting is not a marketed feature. No named PSP or casino-platform connectors surfaced on the vendor site, so operators should assume a direct API build.

Time to integrate

No public integration-time claim beyond the vendor-stated 24-hour new-market deployment figure on the gaming page (Jul 2026). API and SDK details arrive after sales contact, so the real calendar comes out of the sales process.

Named gaming operators
Evidence class per name, and the list is short
888 Holdings, a named case study with a quote from Ofir Asbet, Director of Funnel & Customer Safety Products, the single named regulated-gaming operator on recordNo other named regulated-gaming operators surfaced on the vendor site or in tier-1 trade press (Jul 2026)
Cross-industry brand references
Non-gaming, and drawn from security reporting rather than a vendor roster
TikTok, Uber, and X, named as AU10TIX clients in the June 2024 404 Media incident reportFiverr, PayPal, Coinbase, LinkedIn, and Upwork, also named in that reporting (Upwork said it had moved to a different provider)These are a security-reporting client list, not a vendor case-study roster, and none are gaming
Corporate structure
Ownership and holding chain
ICTS International N.V. (OTCQB: ICTSF), the SEC-reporting majority parent, 66.30% as of 31 Dec 2025 (was 67.51% at 31 Dec 2024)AU10TIX Technologies B.V. (Netherlands, Schiphol), the holding company under ICTSTPG ($60M, July 2019) and Oak HC/FT ($20M preferred, November 2019), the minority investors behind the $80M ICTS cites
Stack:API plus SDK with mobile document capture, developer details gated behind salesMulti-layer deepfake and injection-attack detection on metadata, visual, and behavioral signalsDocument verification, biometric with liveness, and AI age estimationeKYC validating name, date of birth, and government credentials against trusted sourcesAML, PEP, and sanctions screening with ongoing monitoring
Product stack

Products & tools

A modular verification and authentication engine: document verification, biometric selfie with liveness, AI age estimation, proof of address, eKYC, and AML/PEP/sanctions screening, all fronted by the multi-layer deepfake and injection-attack detection AU10TIX markets hardest on.

Track record

On the record

The history that matters: the milestones, the scale, the awards, and who runs it.

AU10TIX was founded in 2002 by Ron Atzmon and Gil Atzmon, headquartered in Tel Aviv with a development center in Hod Hasharon. It is the authentication-technology arm of ICTS International N.V. (OTCQB: ICTSF), held through AU10TIX Technologies B.V. in the Netherlands, with ICTS owning 66.30% as of 31 December 2025 (down from 67.51% a year earlier). Minority investors TPG ($60M in July 2019) and Oak HC/FT ($20M in preferred in November 2019) put in the $80M ICTS cites, routed through an ABC Technologies B.V. intermediate holding. Dan Yerushalmi has been CEO since January 2023. The segment provides authentication services to financial and other companies predominantly in the United States, and its audited FY2025 results, revenue of $31.5M down 31.5% from $46.0M and a $12.2M net loss, are disclosed in the parent's Form 20-F filed 30 April 2026.

$31.5MSegment revenue
-$12.2M net lossSegment result
66.30%Parent ownership
$80MMinority investment

Brands & clients on the platform

888 HoldingsTikTokUberXPayPalCoinbaseLinkedIn

Corporate

Legal entity
AU10TIX Ltd.
Parent group
ICTS International N.V.
Also known as
AU10TIX Technologies B.V.
Product lines
Document verificationBiometric verificationAge estimationProof of AddresseKYCAML/PEP/Sanctions screeningDeepfake & injection-attack detectionPOS verification

Leadership

Dan Yerushalmi
CEO · since 2023
Ron Atzmon
Co-Founder · since 2002

Milestones

  1. AU10TIX is founded by Ron Atzmon and Gil Atzmon in Israel, later the authentication-technology arm of ICTS International.

  2. TPG invests $60M (July) and Oak HC/FT $20M in preferred (November), the $80M minority stake in the AU10TIX business.

  3. Dan Yerushalmi is appointed CEO (January), the year a roughly 9% workforce cut was reported.

  4. 404 Media reports (26 June) that AU10TIX administrative credentials were exposed online for over a year and still worked when tested, with access to end-user ID data for TikTok, Uber, and X users.

  5. AU10TIX publishes a retrospective statement (28 July) describing the event as inactive legacy credentials with no production connection and no data exposure, an account that conflicts with the 2024 reporting.

  6. The parent ICTS files its FY2025 Form 20-F (30 April): AU10TIX segment revenue $31.5M (down 31.5%) and a $12.2M net loss, with ICTS at 66.30% ownership as of December 2025.

Where they're pushing next

  • Deepfake and injection-attack detection as synthetic fraud rises, the vendor's clearest strength
  • US market, where the segment serves customers predominantly per the parent 20-F
  • UK, anchored by the OfDIA DIATF register presence
Due diligence

Trust signals

The checks an operator runs before signing: incidents, enforcement, ownership, and longevity, from our research.

Red flags on record
  • Security incidents: Major
24 yrsTrack record
Security incidents
Major
Regulatory actions
None
Litigation
None
Financial stability
Uncertain
Ownership transparency
Opaque
Client longevity
Weak
Key people public
Yes
Clients verifiable
Verifiable
Complaint patterns (from public reviews)
  • a 2024 credential exposure on the product's data-handling perimeter
  • a 2024-vs-2025 account that narrows the incident's apparent severity
  • an audited revenue decline with customers lost per the filing
How it stacks up

AU10TIX vs alternatives

The same attributes, side by side, from our normalized provider set, useful for seeing where this vendor fits against its peers.

AttributeAU10TIXVeriffJumioSumsub
Founded2002201520102015
Team500+
US marketAvailableAvailableAvailable
PricingNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedPublic
Country coverageGlobal coverage marketed230+ countries200+ countries and territoriesDocument-free verification in…
UK DIATFUK OfDIA DIATF statutory regi…UK DIATF gammaYesCertified IDSP

The take: Veriff is the closest peer, a document-and-biometric IDV vendor with a thin gaming footprint of its own (Stake only) but a cleaner financial and incident picture. Jumio brings the deepest named gaming roster and a US-lens push, and Sumsub pairs a broader stack with public per-check pricing AU10TIX hides. AU10TIX's edge over all three is deepfake and injection-attack detection plus speed, while its weakness is the audited revenue decline, the 2024 incident with its rewritten disclosure, and a one-operator gaming record. Pick AU10TIX when synthetic-fraud defense is the specific problem and you can accept the trust and stability history.

Commercials

Pricing & terms

AU10TIX quotes pricing on request. Exact figures come at the deal stage, under NDA. Here's what's public about the model and terms.

Enterprise sales only, no per-check or per-seat schedule on record (Jul 2026)

Turnkey

ModelOn request
Setup feeOn request

White-label

ModelOn request
Setup feeOn request
Request commercials
Working with them

Support & account management

The service layer operators inherit: availability, the channels support runs on, and language coverage.

Dedicated account managerB2B supportEnglishSLANone published (Jul 2026)
Channels
Email
Questions

Frequently asked

The things operators actually ask before signing.

What happened in the 2024 data-exposure incident, and why does AU10TIX's story differ between 2024 and 2025?+

In June 2024, 404 Media reported that AU10TIX administrative credentials to a logging platform had been exposed online for more than a year, harvested by infostealer malware from a NOC manager's machine and posted to Telegram, and were still functional when tested in June 2024, giving access to names, dates of birth, nationalities, ID numbers, document types, and links to ID-document images of end users verified for TikTok, Uber, and X. AU10TIX said at the time that PII was potentially accessible but that it saw no evidence the data had been exploited. In a July 2025 retrospective, the company recast the event as a single set of previously compromised inactive employee credentials for a legacy log-management system with no connection to production systems and no evidence of data exposure. That 2025 account is narrower and more exculpatory than both the 2024 reporting (credentials that still worked and exposed real ID-image links) and AU10TIX's own 2024 potentially-accessible admission, which is the discrepancy we record, dated to both statements.

Is AU10TIX financially stable?+

The audited numbers show a business in decline. Because majority parent ICTS International N.V. is SEC-reporting, AU10TIX's segment figures are disclosed: in the FY2025 Form 20-F filed 30 April 2026, the authentication segment's revenue fell 31.5% from $46.0M in 2024 to $31.5M in 2025 and swung to a $12.2M net loss after a prior-year profit, with the filing stating that some customers were lost and activity declined against largely fixed costs. The revenue drop is chronologically adjacent to the 2024 credential-exposure incident, though the filing does not attribute a cause. This is the rare filing-grade financial visibility in the tier, and what it shows is a shrinking, loss-making segment as of the 2025 fiscal year.

Which gambling operators actually use AU10TIX?+

One named operator is on record: 888 Holdings, a case study with a quote from Ofir Asbet, Director of Funnel & Customer Safety Products. No other named regulated-gaming operators surfaced on the vendor site or in tier-1 trade press (Jul 2026). That single named client is the thinnest gaming footprint of the identity-verification vendors we rate, and 888's own materials were not confirmed to name AU10TIX, so the evidence is the vendor case study rather than operator-side corroboration. The cross-industry names in circulation (TikTok, Uber, X, PayPal, Coinbase) come from the 2024 breach reporting and are non-gaming.

Is AU10TIX PA Certified or Registered?+

Registered, which is the lower of Pennsylvania's two classes. AU10TIX Ltd. is a Registered gaming service provider on the PGCB list (as of 3/24/2026) for ID verification services, expiring 04/12/2027. PA distinguishes Certified from Registered, and AU10TIX holds Registered, a rung below GBG, Socure, and Shufti Pro, which are all Certified. It is also present on the UK OfDIA DIATF statutory register (page 1), though the register listing does not publish the per-service detail.